tegater 789 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 On mobile so can't put up link, but sky news reporting. Should mean a bit more work for you urban lads! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TUFFTY 1,476 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 http://news.sky.com/story/1050008/fox-bites-off-babys-finger-in-cot-attack Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bob.243 8,999 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 An RSPCA spokeswoman said the only reason a fox would attack is due to fear. Wankers. 14 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 Good old arsePCA sticking up for the vermin again. "The only reason a fox would attack is due to fear" Do these people not read the facts before opening their gobs?When exactly did the fox get scared? When it was climbing into the house or when it saw the baby? 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vixen 528 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 Aww poor wee toaty baby, what a sight for the mother to find Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnGalway 1,043 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 Makes a change from Dingos I spose. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gentle assasin 9 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 It wasnt like it was cornered or trapped. It climbed into the house, bit the baby and then got off. Vermin sticking up for vermin. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
steve66 3,543 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 A 1 month old baby , how sads that , Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 When a fox drags a baby from it's cot and bites off a finger, that's not fear!!! RSPCA coming up trumps as per, how anyone takes them seriously anymore is beyond me. 13 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,494 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 Aye read that the only reason it would attack is because of fear ,when are these folk going to wake up and smell the coffee how many kids is that now that foxes have attacked 4/5 ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LaraCroft 863 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 I think I'd be more worried about a fox being in the house at all. Ok, so I don't have kids, but the fact one was in the house would freak me out and make me wonder why they are not being controlled 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigdog Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 terrible, the dosy c**t from the society needs a good shovel to the back of the heed 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
patterdale666 1,620 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 terrible, the dosy c**t from the society needs a good shovel to the back of the heed If it was their child they wouldnt be so quick to pick up for the poor fox fucken arseholes 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Macky 227 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 i know the rspca are a pain in the arse but sooner or later the government will put a bounty on them ,there is no other way possible to control these numbers of urban foxes ,they cannot be poisoned for the sake of pets .only in my eyes the only way is by bringing back terrier work to go under sheds and such like or bring back the good old spring trap which has been proven in the past and therefore we have a problem it is called the good old rspca 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ratreeper 441 Posted February 10, 2013 Report Share Posted February 10, 2013 Not to just play devil's advocate, but I don't get why you are all jumping up and down about it at all. The number of fox attacks on kids is tiny, there are plenty more injuries caused by badly socialised surrogate-kid terriers and many many people are killed by deer. So whether or not foxes need to be controlled in urban areas I don't think child attacks is any meaningful basis to argue from as it's so bloody uncommon, if it was common it wouldn't make the news would it and it would be just another event like the thousands of people hurt when pissed etc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.